Random musing: why does the design of Nikon’s lens caps make more sense than that of Canon’s?

I’ve lost count of the number of times in which I had fumbled while trying to remove a Canon lens cap from between the lens hood. The releases on a Canon lens cap are at the sides and they are partially obscured when you have a lens hood fixed to the lens; to remove the lens cap, you would have to rotate the cap to an angle where both releases are aligned with the open spaces between the petals of the hood. It almost seems as if Canon designers never took into account that people would actually use lens hoods.

canon-lc3.jpg

On the contrary, the releases on a Nikon lens cap are in the middle of the cap. There are two advantages to this design: firstly, it is much, much easier to reach into the lens hood and release the lens cap. Secondly, if you accidentally brush your lens against something, the chances of the lens cap popping off are lower. Don’t laugh, but that has actually happened to me before; I bumped a lens against a street fixture, the lens cap went ‘Twaaang!’ and rolled merrily down a pavement. The chase which ensured was not a glamorous picture at all.

nikon-lc3.jpg

After a recce today, during which I alternated between dropping the lens cap while removing it and smudging the lens while trying to cap it, I went down to the local store and bought Nikon lens caps to replace all the Canon ones.

Maybe it’s just me—in that I have no luck whatsoever with lens caps—and while it may be a small or even non issue with some users, it bothers me a fair bit. And, no, I do not believe in tying a lens cap to the body and having it flap madly in the wind when I’m trying to take a picture.

Minus one to Canon for ergonomics.

On an aside, it is interesting how more and more Nikon accessories are finding their way onto my EOS body; first, it was the DK-21M Magnifying Eyepiece, then it was the Nikon AH-4 Hand Grip. Now it is the Nikon lens caps. These days, my mentor, who is a Nikon user, smirks everytime he sees me.