Needing a 400-600mm telephoto reach for a location recce, I purchased the Kenko 2x Teleplus Pro 300 Teleconverter (more popularly known as extenders, doublers, or T-cons).

Kenko has two lines of teleconverters available: the Teleplus Pro 300 (1.4x, 2x and 3x) and the Teleplus (MC4 and MC7, 1.4x and 2x respectively). Being of the former, which is the higher quality of the two, the build quality of the Kenko 2x Teleplus Pro 300 teleconverter is pretty good. The mounts are made of stainless steel. The Teleplus Pro 300 features circuitry designed to electronically operate the same way as Canon’s own teleconverters. TheTeleplus Pro 300 is available in black or white.
Why I chose Kenko over Canon
The reason why I chose the Kenko over the Canon Extender EF 2x II is because there is no protruding front glass element on the former, meaning you can just about couple any EF lens with it; with the Canon Extender EF 2x II, the front glass element is designed to extend into the mount of certain EF telephoto lenses, thereby limiting the number of lenses you can use with the latter; specifically, only the EF 70-200 f/2.8L, the 70-200 f/2.8L IS, the 70-200 f/4.0L, the 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS zoom lenses and prime lenses of 135mm and higher. Do note that Kenko teleconverters are currently incompatible with EF-S lenses; if you require EF-S coupling, go for the Canon Extender EF 1.4x II or 2x II (it has to be the Mark II version).; Canon’s own Extenders are not compatible either.

As there is a loss of two stops with any 2x teleconverter (one stop with a 1.4x teleconverter), Kenko recommends using a lens with a minimum aperture of f/4 (opening of f/4 and bigger, not smaller) to ensure AF will work. Kenko also recommends the use of its 2x Extender only with focal lengths 50mm and upwards.
An initial test with an EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM proved the limitations to be true. Using this lens on the recce, autofocus failed most of the time and, as a result of the already mediocre image quality of the lens, images turned out very soft and flat. Also, the fact that the Micro USM in this lens has abysmal performance to begin with. I cannot emphasize enough that you will need very good, sharp telephoto lenses if you intend to use a 2x teleconverter.
Next, I tested my regular walkaround lens, an EF 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 USM. While AF works pretty fine in daylight, AF performance was average in low-light conditions or at night; AF lock is effective down to f/7 before it starts hunting.
In summary, I am very pleased with the performance of this teleconverter. It is a huge plus to now have the extra reach on the 24-85 without too big a dip in AF performance. Optical quality is barely compromised. Do note, though, that your mileage may vary.
The teleconverter tape trick
A teleconverter designed for the EOS system has 11 electronic pins on the end where a lens is coupled. Three of these pins on the teleconverter are responsible for reporting its presence to the lens which, in turn, factors in the teleconverter’s stop loss before reporting its aperture to the camera body. The result of this exchange is such that a f/2.8 lens will report its aperture as f/5.6. Based on this information, the processor in the camera body decides if it has enough light in which to engage AF effectively.
Autofocus functionality in EOS camera bodies are assured at either a minimum of f/8 (1D, 1Ds, 1DMkII, 1DMkIIN, 1Ds MkII, EOS 1 and EOS 3) or a minimum of f/5.6 (D30, D60, 10D, 300D, 350D, 20D, 30D, and 5D); any aperture smaller than either of the two above and AF is not guaranteed to work.
It has been discovered that, by applying a small piece of tape over the three pins, the presence of the teleconverter will not be reported to the camera body. As a result, it will not shut down AF even if the aperture becomes lower than the required minimum The tape trick is most useful for slower lenses, which, in the case of a 2x teleconverter, is anything below f/2.8.
If you look at the electronics contacts on your lens and see only 8 (7 square ones and 1 doubled), don’t bother applying the tape trick, since it means your lens is not teleconverter-aware in the first place. Only some Canon telephoto lenses have the three extra electronic contacts that make them teleconverter-aware. Also, some older teleconverters, either by Kenko or other aftermarket manufacturers, have only 8 electronic pins; if you have such a make, you won’t need the tape trick either.
Follow the steps below to apply the tape trick:
- Place the teleconverter in front of you such that the end where the lens is coupled to is facing you.
- Make sure that the row of electronic pins are at the 12 o’clock position (refer to photograph below).
- The three pins are the first three from the left of the row.
- Tape them over with a small piece of tape. I suggest that you apply the tape in such a way that it creates an upward slope over the first pin. This way, when you mount a lens, there is less chance of the tape dislodging.

Dear Experts,
as far as I understand You seem to know a lot about KENKO -Teleconverters.
I am using Canon 10D and originally I am looking for KENKO 1,5 SHQ Converter, because I learned this typ is one of the best one can get.
I am not sure wether tis is available on the market or if it is produced any more.
Could You please let me know how to get an 1,5 SHQ or which one is next best .
Thank You very much for Your help. .
Kind regards
Wolfgang
Hi Wolfgang,
If I am not mistaken, the Kenko 1.5 SHQ is an older model; it has only 8 pins versus the 11 pins found on later models. I believe the SHQ has been superseded by the Teleplus Pro models.
This FAQ may be of help: http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=41922
Dear Tetanus
THOUSAND THANKS for your GREAT WORK and GOOD INFORMATION.
I have the Question to ask you, If I need to use 400 mm. for photos on my OLD Canon 1DS whicj one is the Sharpest Photos
1) my Canon EF 100-400 mm. F/4.5-5.6 L IS USM.
or 2) Canon EF 70-200 F/2.8 L IS USM with Canon Extender 2X II
THANKS for answer my Question
Surapon Sujjavanich, AIA., CPS.
Apex, NC., USA.
Hi Surapon,
You are most welcome.
Technically, and more importantly theoretically, using your 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM doubled on your 1Ds should yield a sharper picture than if you used the EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM.
Comparing the MTF charts of these two lenses, you will find that the 70-200mm at 200mm yields a sharper resolution than the 100-400mm at 400mm. Of course, MTF charts are theoretical, hence the best way to find out an answer to your question would be to do a comparative test on a resolution chart with both lenses.
It is interesting, though, that doubling the 70-200mm will give you the same f-stop as the 100-400mm (not taking IS into account).
Do post back if you ever do such a comparison test. I’d be most interested to know the results as your question is a very interesting one with a lot of ramifications.
Hello
your informations are very interesting.
Please let me know if this teleconverter:
Kenko 2x AF Teleplus DG MC4 Autofocus Teleconverter for Canon EOS
works with a lens Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM mounted on a Canon 4ooD (Rebel xti).
Thank you and greetings from Italy
Paola
What about this converter’s 3x brother? Do you think there would be too much quality loss?
I don’t have any experience with the 3x, but considering how images taken with the 2x and long lenses are less saturated, I don’t think the 3x is a good idea.
Yes, it will work. But I don’t know if it will improve macro magnification, though.
Thanks. I came looking for more information about Kenko, and I got it: I believe however your text has an gross error of fact:
“if you require EF-S coupling, go for the Canon Extender EF 1.4x II or 2x II (it has to be the Mark II version)”
The above (at time of writting) is incorrect, no EF-S lens yet made fits the criteria to mate with either of these extenders: please advise specifically, if I am wrong.
Thanks
W
Thanks, William, for pointing out the error; after some Googling, it does appear Canon’s Extenders do not work with EF-S.
Thanks for the information. I am currently using a EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM on a Canon XT body and was never expecting the greatest quality of pictures but wanted something that would allow me to grab some decent pictures of the surrounding mountains.
What are your thoughts on the MC4 and MC7 2X teleconverters versus the 300 Pro? I would like something relatively inexpensive and not looking for the greatest quality, but something decent for my setup.
Unfortunately, I have no experiences with either the MC4 and MC7. You should be able to get some user opinions on that on Photo.net.
Hi
Thanks for the nice review. I am using a canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM lens with a eos400d body. Do you think that a kenko pro 300 teleconverter 1.4x would be suitable for this ? I am mostly photographing birds so don’t really care too much about the edges of the pictures.
thanks in advance!
Hi Rohit,
Your lens and the 1.4x TC should be fine. You have to bear in mind that adding the 1.4x TC to your 75-300 means that you now have 420mm at f/8. Since AF performance for 400D is assured at a minimum of f/5.6, you can expect the AF on your 400D to hunt quite a bit.
But I notice your lens has IS, which, theoretically compensates a stop or two. It’d be interesting to know if this adds back the stop lost by the 1.4x.
Thanks for the answer. But I made a small mistake in typing my lens. Instead of 75-300 mm f/4-5.6 IS USM, my lens is the 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 IS USM. I hope it does not make too much of a difference. Most of my shots are in daylight, and I have noticed that the lens I have provides excellent results, even at the longer focal lengths, regardless of some other people’s experiences. So I am quite happy with the shots. However, with this kenko pro 1.4x TC I was hoping to add “just” a little bit more reach. The canon TCs are not compatible with my lens, as they seem to be compatible only for the “L” series lenses.
No, the typo doesn’t make a difference. Indeed, Canon’s TCs are compatible with only select L telephoto zooms, as they have a protruding element that is designed to extend into the recessed rear element in those lenses.
You will get a substantial increase in reach with the 1.4x but, as I’d advised, your AF may hunt. Even if you do take mostly daylight shots, AF is highly dependent on whether it has sufficient contrast to latch onto, hence going back to my previous reply.
The safest bet, really, is if you can somehow wrangle the TC from your store for a day of testing.
Thanks again. I think I will go for it anyway. There seem to be many people happy that it works nicely and some that are not so happy. However, there seem to be a few different versions of this kenko 1.4x teleconverter. Could you suggest which would be the correct model to buy as the nomenclature is a bit confusing ? I’m buying in Germany, and found this on amazon.de for canon cameras. Kenko MC 1,4x Konverter C/AF PRO 300 DG. Is this a correct model to buy ? Thanks once again !
No problem. Sounds like the right one. If you need confirmation, try Kenko’s website: http://www.kenko-tokina.co.jp/e/index.html
Hi, I bought a Kenko 2x MC4 DG and I used a Canon 70-200mm F2.8 L USM pls tell my if the trick with the tape works with this conversion?
Yes, it will work. In fact, the tape trick will work with all lenses.
Hi,
I am looking at buying one of the Kenko 2x Teleplus Pro 300 Teleconverters. I am wondering though, if the tip you mention with the tape would work on a Sigma 70-300mm f4-5.6 APO DG with a Canon 400d? Thank you for taking the time to write about the Kenko convertor I found it interesting.
Neil
Hi Neil,
You’re most welcome. The Kenko TC will work with your lens, though I am pretty certain the AF performance will be unsatisfactory.
Hi Tetanus.
Can you recommend a 1.5 or 2 x extender for the EOS 40 D and EF 300 L 2.8 from the Kenko range, I have looked on the Web and it seems there are quite a lot of them, this is making a decision difficult.
Many thanks in advance
Colin
Hi Colin,
Go with the Teleplus Pro 300 series. They are the latest. The MC7 and MC4 are older models.
Hi,
Just an update to say, that I have purchased the Kenko 2x Pro converter, and as you rightly say the AF function does not work to well. It is ok at the 70mm end but at the 300mm end it hunts about alot and thats it. Having said that though I am really happy with it. Thank you again for taking the time to write about it.
Neil
Hi Neil,
Thanks for sharing your experience. The stop loss at 300mm is really too much of an impact on your camera’s AF.
Hi Tetanus,
Nice review. I intent to buy a teleconverter and your review helps a lot.
I am using a canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 USM II lens (not IS) with a eos350d body.
Do you thing that a Kenko 2x Teleplus Pro 300 Teleconverter will work fine, or the 1.4x will do better? Which one do you recommend, or I should forget this idea?
I intent to use the teleconverter to take photos of wild life.
Thanks in advance!
Hi Richard,
If you really must, I’d rather you go with the 1.4x than the 2x, since adding the 2x TC to your particular lens stops it down to f/8-f/11, which is beyond the f-stop that guarantees AF performance on the 350D. With a 1.4x, it’s not so bad.
Since you are intending to shoot wild life, I say go for a faster lens if your budget allows for it.
Hi Tetanus
Do you know if it is possible to use the teleplus pro 300 teleconverter 2x together with a Canon 70 – 200 mm f4,0 L and kan i expect at good quality?
With the 2x TC, your 70-200mm will be performing at f/8 instead.
On a 1D, 1Ds, 1DMkII, 1DMkIIN, 1Ds MkII, EOS 1 or EOS 3, it should work fine. But on a D30, D60, 10D, 300D, 350D, 20D, 30D, or 5D, AF is not guaranteed to work.
Hi Tetanus
Thanks for your advise. Doyou mean that it is better to buy at 1,4x TC anc crop the picture afterwards than use at 2x TC when i use a 70-200mm f4L and a 20d or will the cropping result in more bad pictures?
Hi Tetanus
Du you think it is better to use at TC 1,4 converter and crop the picture afterwards than use a TC2x convertar together with a 70-200 f4L and a eos 20D?
Since your lens is an f/4, I think you’ll have better performance with the 1.4x.
Thank you Tetanus You are right about your comment. I now have a 2x tc on my 70-200mm f4L, it is possible to autofocus with the tape trick but not if it it is a bird in the air, then the AF hunts and its only possible to take photos in sunlight and iso at at least 400 iso -most often 800 iso. the contrast is a little bit lower but with a photoshop program it is possible to make the pictures descent.
Do you know if there is something wrong with my TC first time i use it the aperture of my camera shows f8 but now it shows f4-, the exposure time is right?
Lars,
The tape trick covers the three pins that the TC uses to relay its stop loss to the camera body. I am guessing that, in the first time you used the TC, it reported the correct f-stop to the camera (which is f/8, 2 stops under). Once you have taped the pins, the TC becomes invisible to the camera, which is why the reading doesn’t change.
[...] el x2, conserva el AF. Tambin se habla de ese kenko MC …. y se dijo, a travs de este enlace: Kenko 2x Teleplus Pro 300 Teleconverter A tiny blip in the continuum que el Teleplus es mejor en calidad de construccin…. entre otras cosas… pero que vienen ah… [...]
The Kenko 1.4x costs more than the Kenko 1.5x but curious about the picture quality between the two telcon’s. I already have the 1.5x and using it on a 10D w/an 80-200mm 2.8 and curious how much difference there would be if I “stepped” up to the 1.4x or just keep the 1.5x.
Hi I would like to know if you lens that you are using the kenko with is a Canon 80-200mm EF F2.8 lens? I also have one and would like to know if a kenko teleconverter 300 Pro would fit. Please let me know.
Thank you
Julani Angelucci
Hi Julani,
The TC should fit your lens.
Reach-wise, the loss from going from the 1.5x to the 1.4x is negligible. And, apparently, the image quality of both TCs are similar.
hello, i have a canon 75-300mm III, do you think it will work fine with the 2x kenko ? i also have eos 40d . i want to know if the autofocus will work fine at f/11
Lulian,
You’re not gonna get any good AF performance out of your set-up…
The Canon teleconverters don’t work with some S and/or L series lenses so I bought the Kenko 2x teleplus 300. I was quite frustrated with the AF at first as it didn’t work at all but I used the tape trick and voila! It works nicely with all my lenses. It work mostly with day light but most my photography is during the day or with enough daylight anyway. I noticed my photos aren’t as saturated but I increased the saturation in my camera (via menu) and it did the trick. It’s a nice little toy and I’m glad I bought it.
Also, I have the 40D and 6 lenses with telephoto zooms (75-300 IS, 70-200 f/4 IS), it works on all my lenses.
Hi, Will the 2x kenko Teleplus Pro 300 work with my Nikon D200 with the 18-200mm VR lens? Thanks for your input.
Hi cki,
Sorry, I have no experiences with Nikkor lenses.
hi tet;
with 40d plus 55-250 mm, does it work and also with AF?
Fgrafi – Not advisable. You will get dismal AF performance from this lens because of f/5.6 at its longest end.
The minimum aperture in order for AF to definitely work on the 40D is f/5.6. Coupling the 55-250mm with a 2x TC increases the aperture on the longest end to f/11, which is way off the criteria for assured AF.
But, seeing how it is an IS lens, you may have some luck…
Hi, nice to meet you, very interesting information about teleconverters. I would like to know your opinion. I have a Canon 28-105 USM II f/3.5-4.5, a Canon 55-250 IS f/4-5.6 and a Canon XTi, i want to start taking photographs of birds. I can get the Kenko 2x DG AF (dont know if this is the Pro 300 Model i am quoting the specifications given by the salesman) but i am not sure that this is the right product to match my lenses and expectatives. Thank you very much for your comments.
Greetings from Mexico.
Hi Alex,
Unfortunately, you will not get satisfactory results with the lenses you have. You may get by when shooting in daylight, but even so, when you use the long end of their focal length, you will be facing too much stop loss to get accurate AF lock, especially if your subject is moving.
Found this thread by chance but very good content and answers many questions I’ve had in the past. My lens is the Canon 70-300 4.5-5.6 IS DO, used on Canon 400D. Trying to improve the reach for wildlife and birds. Would the 1.4x or 2x be best – not worried about auto focus.
Hi Phil,
With the three stops that IS gives you with this lens, theoretically you should be fine with a 1.4x, though you’d want to try this setup only with subjects that aren’t moving (the stops gained with IS will not freeze motion).
Hi Tetanus
Thanks for the info already posted, but I am in the process of purchasing a Kenko pro300 2x, I intend to use this on my EOS 1000D with a Tamron 70/300 will I encounter the same af problems. Also use a 18/55 canon efs is
thanks keith
Dear Sir,
Can I purchase this ” Kenko 2x Teleplus Pro 300 Teleconverter” for use on my Canon 400D with Canon 100mm Macro USm lens?
I need to have a closer image and bigger image using this with my normal working distance like 2feet away. is this the right product to select??
http://www.flickr.com/photos/stanycjw2008/sets/72157610569748516/
Hi!
In terms of image quality which converter is better Kenko Pro 300 2x or Canon EX 2x?
I will primarily be using the teleconverter with Canon EF 70-200 f 2.8 L IS and possibly with Sigma 105 f 2.8 mounted on Canon 5D mark II.
Thanks in advance!
Maria.
You’ll be fine with either, though the Canon resolves better at the edges.
If your budget allows for it, go for the Canon EF 2x II Extender. It has flourite coating and weather-sealing with L lenses. But, do note that the Canon EF 2x II Extender has a protruding front element where it couples to the lens, which is meant for the rear element of some L lenses to fit into. Hence, the Canon EF 2x II Extender does not work every lens. But, worry not: it fits the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS. You will have to check if the Sigma 105mm f/2.8 has a recessed rear element. If not, you need to get the Kenko instead.
Follow this link for a chart of the lenses the Canon EF 2x II Extender is compatible with: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_Extender_EF#Compatibility_information
But, if you can forsake the Sigma 105mm—and assuming it does not have a recessed rear element—the Canon will be a better purchase. Because the protruding front element is designed to reduce internal flares when used with compatible L lenses, you will get better image quality when you eventually move up to a longer super-telephoto. This way, you protect your investment.
Hope this helps.
i need some help with a t/c for Nikon D2X and the lens will be 70-200vr will the kenko
work or would i be better with the Nikon 2x
No experiences with Nikon bodies or lenses, but the principle’s the same. You’ll need to find out at what f-stop the D2X’s AF is guaranteed to work, and then do the math.
wondering what zoom levels a sigma 150-500 lens and a 1.4 teleconverter would create on a 40D… would it be 300-1000 being the sensor is 1.6?
With a 1.4x TC, the focal length will be 210—700mm. With the 1.6x field-of-view crop of the 40D’s sensor, the final focal length will be 336—1120mm. But field-of-view crop is inconsequential; it is the resultant image on the sensor that is being cropped, and not that the lens actually zooms in at 336—1120mm.
I have Tamron 70-200 DI lens(with motor) and Kenko TC 2x. Problem that I face ,the lens with TC cannot focus at all using my Nikon D90. When I try with others lens (nikon 70-300AFD) kenko TC work well. Any idea to solve this?
Sounds like an incompatibility issue to me, that, maybe the lens isn’t talking to the TC. Wish I could help you more, but I don’t have any solid experience with either Tamron or Nikkor lenses.
I have just become a dslr shooter (canonxsi) and purchased a kenko teleplus 1.4.
I felt that the cost savings and the extended lens compatibility versus the canon
1.4 offering was better for me.
It’s permanently on the body it seems.
I have a 17-85 and a 70-200 f4L and am looking at the sigma 150-500 to round out my basic kit.
My results have been very satisfying.
It seems that a quad core, dslr and fresh air is blowing the dust out of my 35 year medium format fixation with its immediate gratification, no limit shooting and fast focusing long zooms.
I have a canon EOS Rebel xTi with an EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 II lens. What 2x teleconverter will work with this?
The Kenko will work, but you will get dismal AF performance from this lens because of f/5.6 at its longest end.
The minimum aperture in order for AF to definitely work on the 40D is f/5.6. Coupling the 55-250mm with a 2x TC increases the aperture on the longest end to f/11, which is way off the criteria for assured AF.
With a 1.4x TC, the focal length will be 210—700mm. With the 1.6x field-of-view crop of the 40D’s sensor, the final focal length will be 336—1120mm.
Hi, Thanks for the information, im now using the Kenko 1.4x on my Canon 40D + Canon 100-400mm combo.
I just received my Kenko 2x Teleplus Pro 300 Teleconverter and have been trying to understand the AF. I’m shooting with a Canon 40D body and the Canon 70-200 f/4 L IS lens. Do I need to use the tape trick for the AF to work with this lens? AF does with my 50mm 1.4 and other lenses.
For your body (the 40D), you’ll most likely get better results by taping the pins. When used with the TC, your 70-200mm f/4 becomes f/8, which is past the minimum aperture for guaranteed AF on the 40D; AF is guaranteed only at f/5.6 and above.
I understand it now. The tape trick does work. Is there a specific type of tape that is better to use?
Thanks for such a quick response.
You’ll need tape that is fairly sticky, so that it won’t come off too easily. Gaffer tape should do nicely.
>
I have a Canon 450D and have got the Kenko x2 converter and used it with my Sigma 80-400mm. I have taped the pins as you show at the start of this article and everything works well. even at the now 800mm end there is minimal hunting and the AF works. I am very pleased. Than you.
Hello,
I have a Tamron LD 70-300 1:4 – 5.6 AF lens. can I use a Kenko 2x teleconverter Canon EOS ?
what problems will I face ? (I have a Canon eos 1000d camera)
Thnx
Jean Pierre
Yes you can, but expect AF to not work very well with your EOS 1000D, as the two-stop loss from using the 2x TC is beyond the guaranteed AF performance of your class of camera body.
Thanks for the quick response. You say I lose to stops, what will I lose than ?
is it only auto focus or what else ?
(sorry for the English, I life in Holland)
jp
AF on the EOS 1000D requires a minimum of f/5.6 to accurately lock on. So, when you use a 2x TC on your Tamron LD 70-300 f/4–5.6 lens, its f-stops become two more stops. The effect is that depth of field will become deeper, and also that the stop loss may result in your camera not being able to lock AF under certain conditions.
What, if any, is the advantage of the Kenko Pro 300 DG 1.4X teleconverter over the Kenko 1.5X DG AF Teleplus unit? The former lists for $199 while the latter lists for $99, implying a significant difference in quality, and yet nowhere can I find any information claiming or confirming any benefit gained by spending the extra $100. Thanks
The Pro 300 is Kenko’s latest series of teleconverters. My guess is that they contain more lens elements grouped than their predecessors, which hopefully Kenko implemented for better optical quality.
This is all I can guess. Maybe Googling some user forums may give you some concrete answers.
There is an extensive comparison of the Tamron 1.4x TC and the Kenko 1.5x TC on the Pentax users discussion forum starting here:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/19694-tamron-tc-converter-pics.html
The conclusion is that the Tamron is equal to the Kenko in image quality and vastly superior to it in maintaining auto-focus. Of course, this says nothing about the Pro series Kenko teleconverters, but I found it highly enlightening nonetheless.
Thank you for that. Very useful information.
Thank you for the great info. I’d like to get one of the TC’s but I see there’s another version of it reads DGX (not DG but with an X). It would be really nice if you can tell me the difference. Thank you.
It would seem that the new DGX Teleplus records equivalent focal length and aperture value in EXIF information.
Hi.
I have a Nikon D60 & Tamron AF70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Lens, can anyone tell me how good or is compatible with Kenko 2x Teleplus Pro 300 Teleconverter & can the AF will work without any problems.
All SLRs need a minimum amount of light, measured in f-stops, for guaranteed AF performance. For Canon SLRs, this is either f/5.6 for consumer-class bodies or f/8 for professional-class bodies. While I have no experience with Nikon SLRs, and hence cannot tell you what the minimum f-stop is for AF on the D60 to work, your 70-300mm f/4-5.6 will lose two stops when coupled with a 2x TC.
Your best bet is to try it out at your local camera store, and see if AF performs well enough for you.
HI.
I have Nikon D60 with Tamron AF 70-300mm 1:4-5.6 Tele-Macro (1:2) A17, Please recommened a teleconverter in which there wont be any problem with auto focusing.
The problem is with your lens, and not with the teleconverters. Personally, I won’t couple a teleconverter with anything slower than f/2.8.
Hi,
By any chance would you know whether will the PRO 300DG 2x work on EF 80-200 2.8L?
Juz acquired this lens recently and would like to add more focal length to it on my 50D.
Thanks.
It’s a fast lens, so you should be fine. But do check if the lens has a protruding rear element; if there is, a Kenko TC won’t fit, and you’ll have to use a Canon TC instead.
Is there any TC on the market that will work with my Canon EOS-450D and my Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 USM macro lens ??? Should I buy the Canon EF 100m f/2.8 macro lens will the Kenko 1.4 Teleplus Pro 300 work with it without AF hunting ??? I use these lenses for underwater photography and I need to know if i should buy a manual focus ring in case of bad AF performance.
Thank you very much for your help and advice !!!
All the Best ….. Francesco
As far as I know, there are no teleconverters that’ll fit EF-S lenses.
Your EF 100, being an f/2.8 lens, will theoretically be fine with a 1.4x teleconverter and even a 2x teleconverter. But I’m not so sure when it comes to underwater photography; I have no experience in that area.
Thank you very much for your assistance Tetanus !!!
My search for a TC for the EF-S 60mm macro is now over !!!
All the Best …. Francesco
I just want to say that you have a nice little compendium of information. I salute you for keeping with all the questions–75% of which could be resolved with a copy/paste from a previous answer. It’s a real disappointment that so many people are too lazy to read previous questions/answers. I could only shake my head as the exact same questions were asked time and time again.
Thanks, Moko. It is quite the chore.
Do any of the TC’s work with Canon 70-300 DO Lens? If so which one is recommended?
I can’t think of a reason why any of the TCs wouldn’t work on a 70-300 DO, though I can’t advise you on image quality as I have no first-hand experience with DO lenses.
Thank you Tetanus for providing the information.
I’m looking at 70-200mm f4L to pair with either a 1.4x or a 2x on my Xsi. I know that a 2x will not guarantee to work, but a 1.4x will. Question is, will it be a worthy upgrade from my 55-250 to 70-200mm + TC?
Also, what TC is better comparing Canon (other than the weather seal) and Kenko?
You’re welcome, Vincent.
The EF 55-250mm is f/4-f/5.6 and its Micro AF mechanism is somewhat slow; coupling any lenses with a TC really helps when there is USM AF. Also, moving up to a 70-200mm—even if it’s the f/4 model—will give you that extra stop at the telephoto end.
And to answer the other part of your question, the only advantage a Canon TC has over those of any other third-party brands is that the front lens element of a Canon Extender is designed to sit closer to the recessed rear lens element of some Canon telephoto lenses, which improves image contrast (see attached image below). Unless you have such lenses, save the money and go for a cheaper Kenko, which you can further use the tape trick for better AF performance.

Hi i have a canon EOS 350D Digital with a EF 75 -300mm f/4 – 5.6 iii zoom lens and am looking to get a teleconverter lens but want the auto focus to work as much as possible.Was looking at the Kenko range but dont think auto focus will work.Am looking to get a 1,4 or 2x lens.Can u advise if this is possible and can you recommend any teleconverters. Many thks.
Any teleconverter is only as good as the lens you couple it with. In your case, don’t expect optimal AF performance at 2x because; 1) the f/stops of your 75-300mm isn’t that bright to begin with, and; 2) AF performance is guaranteed at f/5.6 or brighter; using a 2x on your 75-300mm exceeds what your camera is capable of. You’d be better off with a 1.4x or, budget permitting, with a lens that does at least f/4 constant.
thanks for the info very helpful.Do you reckon the auto focus will work most of the time then if i get a 1.4x
I won’t get my hopes up high if I were you. The best way is to try it at a store.
I have a canon XSi (450d) and use mostly sigma lenses. some are the dg and some are the dc mount. The dc lenses are made for aps-c cameras but I believe they mount the same as the ef canon lenses, They just have a smaller rear element, will the mc4-af dg-c 2.0- work with the dc lenses? Thanks in advance for your help.
I have no experience with Sigma lenses. Sorry.
Hi,
I have a Canon 55-250mm The question is that it is an EF-S lens, not EF. But I keep seing you guys talking about it as though the TC fitted. I assume you’re talking hypothetically?
My mistake. EF-S lenses do not work with any of the teleconverters, even Canon’s.
Hi,
I have Canon Eos 1000D with Tamron 28-75, can I use any teleconverter on it and keep AF function? If so, which one? Thank you very much.
You’ll be fine with either a 1.4x or 2x. As to which one, it depends on you.
Thank you. I don’t really know which brand and model I can choose. I think I need a good 2x one. For instance, which is the best for my Canon and Tammy among Kenko PRO 300 AF DGX 2.0X, Kenko MC7 AF 2.0 DGX, and Kenko MC4 AF 2.0 DGX? Thank you very much
From Kenko’s website:
KENKO TelePlus PRO 300 AF 1.4X DGX Teleconverter
KENKO TelePlus MC4 AF 1.4X DGX Teleconverter
KENKO TelePlus MC7 AF 2.0X DGX Teleconverter
Thank you very much!!
With the Kenko converters particurlary the KENKO TelePlus PRO 300 AF 1.4X DGX Teleconverter it says on their website it isnt compatable with Canon Digital Rebel XT / Rebel 350D . Ive got a Canon EOS 350d Digital but it doesnt says its a rebel one. amywhere on its spec.Does this definately mean that that Kenko Converter wont work with my camera?
The Canon Digital Rebel XT is the US name for the Canon EOS 350D. If Kenko says it’s incompatible with its TelePlus Pro DGX, that means it’s not compatible.
I have a Canon 500d and love my ef-s 60mmf/2.8 macro usm, is there any 2x teleconverters or a substitue that will fit this lens to get me closer
I use a Kenko MC7Dg on my other EF lenses but it does not work for the EFS lens
Frustrated macro user.
Thanks
No teleconverters work with EF-S lenses. You can try macro extension tubes, I guess. You can get a magnification of 1.28x with a 12mm extension tube, and 1.61x with a 25mm extension tube.
hi tetanus,..
it is great review and helpful!!!
i use 50D also i just got the canon 70 200 f/4 L lens, and my simple question : is it will be work good if 2X pro 300 added on this lens ???
and what is most problems that almost happen with pro 300 ???
No problems with the TelePlus Pro 300. The problem is with your camera body; using a 2x with the 70-200mm f/4 drops it down to f/8, beyond the f-stop required by the 50D for assured AF performance.
ok Thks for the clarfication.Do you know if any converters will work with my Canon EOs 350D then.
Any teleconverter will work on your 350D, just that you have to use EF and not EF-S lenses.
Sir,
I have Canon EOS 50d and tamron AF 18 – 250mm Di II asp Lens. Which 2x TC will be compatible and Superior with this combination ? Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 2x OR Tamron SP AF 2X Teleconverter ???
Thanks in Advance.
regards
KS
The Tamron AF18-250mm Di II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro stops down to F/6.3 at 250mm.
Don’t bother, I say. Coupling a 2x TC to this lens won’t work; there’s simply too much stop loss, and I can assure you your 50D will be hunting most, if not all, of the time.
Hi
I am looking at using a kenko 1.4 converter with a canon 70-300mm is usm lense on a canon 350d. Threads on your page suggest this should be ok, however kenko explicity says the converter doesnt work with the 350d… do you have any experience here?
Cheers
Geoff
I don’t know why Kenko points to the 350D as incompatible.
Hi,
I have a 7D canon and I use tamrom 18-270mm.
Will this tamron lense work with Kenko Teleplus PRO 300 DG teleconverter 3x ?
Thank you
Betsy
Your lens will be too slow for a 2x teleconverter.
Thank you.
I just bought Canon EF 400mm f5.6L USM Super Telephoto Lens can it work with canon extender converter EF II?
Thank you
Betsy
f/5.6 is too slow with either the 1.4x or 2x TC. I doubt you’ll get good AF performance.
Hi,
Thank you to answer all my questions.
I have one more question,
I own 7D canon and tamron 18-270mm lens. I like macro photography, sometimes I take macro photos with this lense, its ok.
Should I buy one macro lense condsider I have already have tamrom 18-270mm?
I only have budget between A$300-A$400, which macro lense should I buy?
Thank you again,
I have no experience with the Tamron 18-270mm. Perhaps you can try Canon’s 500D Close-Up Lens, which threads on in front of a telephoto lens: http://www.the-digital-picture.com/reviews/canon-500d-close-up-lens-review.aspx
Alternatively, there is the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM along with extension tubes for magnification larger than 1:1.
Hi
I have a Canon 450D camera with a EFS I55-250mm lens.
I need to find out if a Kenko 300 PRO 2x converter will work on the camera but I heard that I will lose 2 Fstops..
Will that make a big difference
Thanks
Theuns
Yes. Don’t bother; the stop loss is too much for that lens of yours.
Dear Tetanus,
I would be most grateful if you could advise me whether the Kenko teleplus pro 300 could be used in my canon 100-400mm L series zoom lens. The camera body is 7D.
Please mention about the quality of this teleconverter against the Canon extender X2.
rgds
It certainly can be used with that lens. But don’t bother; there will be too much stop loss.
I was planning to buy the same teleconverter as well but wanted to be sure that it works on my 400D and 500D. I have a Canon 70-200 f/4.0L lens that I like to couple with.
I borrowed the old version of the Kenko 2X TC (without the DG) from a friend and tried on both cameras. The cameras on AF just kept hunting and could not focus properly. So no go (Incidentally I tried the set-up on my analog Canon body and it focus properly and quickly).
Went to the shop and spent 2 hours there trying the same with the new DG version. Same result- cannot AF.
So it seems I am out of luck in using this 2X TC with my 70-200 f/4.0L on 400D and/or 500D bodies.
Does anyone have any experience to share that can help me get around the issue?
Thanks- Herbert
It is most likely the limitation is the minimum guaranteed AF for your camera body. Read the middle part of the article again, and you’ll realize the two-stop loss for the 70-200mm f/4 L is beyond the sensitivity of the 400/500D.
Your previous comment on the Tamron 28-270 mm f3.5 – 6.3 was with respect to a 2x TC. I have a Rebel T2i. If I go with the 1.4x TC and tape the 3 pins, would I have acceptable AF?
Also, Kenko’s website states: “Kenko does not recommend them for zoom lenses that have a range starting under 50 mm.” Why is that?
thanks,
Ersten
A 1.4x TC will impose a one-stop loss on a lens. The lens you mentioned is f/6.3 at the long end, which is already beyond the minimum aperture (f/5.6) needed for guaranteed AF on the Rebel T2i/550D. What you really need is a faster lens if you’re looking to extend with a TC.
As for why TCs are best with 50mm and beyond, it’s to do with the field-of-view a TC can cover, and also image distortion; the optics of a TC are designed to work with a “flat” perspective, which begins at 50mm. Wide-angle lenses inherently distorts perspective; a TC can theoretically extend a wide-angle lens, but it will have to have specially designed optics to extend such a field-of-view. However, such a TC will be incompatible with longer focal lengths.
Tetanus
As I see you are an expertise in this matter. I would like yo ask you the following:
I have a Canon EOS 450 D and a Canon 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM lens. I like to take shots to airplanes static and in flight, so I ask you if the teleconverter Kenko MC 1.4x is a good solution.
Is there in the market others teleconverters (no Canon) for this camera?
Thank you
Orlando
Your lens will be too slow with a 1.4x TC. The limitation is your camera body.
Kenko, Tokina and Tamron all make TCs.
Sir,
I’m planning to buy a 2x TC Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 DG.
It will work well on my Canon EOS 7D with a Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM or a Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM?
And about the 1.4x TC Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 DG with the same camera and lenses?
Thanks
J. Vieira
EOS 7D requires minimum f/5.6 for guaranteed AF. With a 2x TC, your 100-400mm will be too slow. The 24-105mm may work reasonably well with the 1.4x TC.
I’d advise you to use a 1.4x.
Hi – I have a canon eos 450d with a canon EF 75 – 300 f 4 – 5.6 III lens and wondered if a Kenko 1.4x tele converter will be compatable.
Your lens will be too slow with a 1.4x TC. The limitation is your camera body.
Kenko teleplus mc4 af dgx 2x
Would this lens work on a Tamron 18-270mm VC lens Nikon Fit please, I’m usually shooting wildlife at 200-270mm will this work on AF or just on a manual basis?
Thanks in advance
I have no experience with Nikon lenses, but the principles are the same. Find out the f-stop of your lens and double it. Then find out the minimum f-stop your camera body needs for AF. If the doubled f-stop is beyond what your camera body can support, then, no, it won’t work.
Thanks tetanus that is now out of the equation as it will not work effectively on a Tamron lens according to Warehouse Express, but would extension tubes work and if so has anyone tried these on a Nikon D40X to Tamron 28-270mm lens
Thanks in advance
Extension tubes are for getting macro functionality out of a lens and not for extending its telephoto reach.
Thank you for all of this information. I have a question.
I have a Canon Rebel 300D and have been trying to decide which Kenko 1.4x lens to get, the MC4 or the Pro. I want to use it with my EF70-300mm F4-5.6 IS USM lens. I am a casual photographer, and the price difference is about $100. Do you think that extra expense is worth the cost? I indulge in nature photography and am headed to Hawaii for vacation, and if there’s a real difference in performance or quality, I’ll go for the Pro. Thanks in advance for your advice.
Go with the Pro. It is improved over the MC models.
Thanks!
Hi tetanus,
I have a canon 500d & canon ef 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM lens and im planing to buy kenko teleplus pro DG 1.4x and 2x.
do i have a good idea or
is this a good combination for my gear?
Thanks!
Pete
You’re not going to get satisfactory AF performance with either the 1.4x or 2x; the limitation is in both your camera body and your lens.
Hi Tetanus,
You mentioned theTeleplus Pro 300 is available in black or white. Can you tell me the different between the black and white version? Is it just the color?
Thanks
There’s no difference.
hi tetanus,
Really appreciate ur work on explaining this matter. I use 7D and sigma 150-500 which appear to be a slow lens for quite a fast body.
i hv ordered canon 400mm f5.6L and it should arrive by next week. This is the question. will Af works (kenko 1.4 or 2x) if i use the tape trick? or at least will it work well in bright daylight. of course this combination is not meant for BIF pict.
appreciate ur answer. sorry if the question is a repetition.
The tape trick works regardless of which lens. But the 7D requires a minimum of f/5.6 for guaranteed AF.
Sorry about my english
Im from Brazil
Im buyin Canon EOS 60D with a Canon 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM Lens. Id like more zoom to take surf pictures. May i use a Kenko 3x Pro 300 DG. Is good ? What do u think? Im going to Orlando FL. Ill buy on bestbuy store and Ritz Camera .
Plz help me . Im starting with DLSR
You need a faster lens.
I have a Canon EOS 550D Camera with an EF 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 IS USM Lens
From the your replies above it looks like the minimum aperture for Auto Focus on the 550D is (f/5.6), I would lose one stop if I used a kenko 1.4 so I would not be able to auto focus at max lens extension.
Is this correct?
Thanks for spending time answering these questions.
Yes, that is correct.
Hello,
I have a Canon 7D with a EF70-300mm F4.5-5.6 DO IS USM lens. I have looked, but have not found any teleconverters that will work with this set-up. Do you have any suggestions? Thanks in advance for any info.
I’m not sure by what you mean when you say you can’t find a set-up that works with this lens, since Kenko teleconverters should work with all EF telephoto lenses.
But, regardless, your lens being f/4-5.6 means you should consider only a 1.4x TC; a 2x TC will make this lens too slow for your 7D.
This tip might be of some use: I have a Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 DG 1.4x converter which I use with my Canon 400mm f5.6 L USM lens. I’ve been using this (with the recommended 3-pins taped) for the past 3 years and find that when using the central autofocus point I achieve auto-focus most of the time with my Canon 400D body, but hardly ever with my Canon 50D body. With the 50D body I’ve found that using just one of its peripheral autofocus points, the one at 2-o’clock when looking through the viewfinder, then I mostly achieve autofocus without too much hunting; it’s then just a simple matter of centralizing the subject in the viewfinder whilst maintaining first pressure on the shutter release button and then pressing it all-the-way to take the shot.
I have achieved some reasonably good results when using this converter, not as good as with just the prime lens, which is very good, but in some cases obviously better than by heavily cropping a prime lens shot to get the same image size.
I don’t use the converter for birds in flight as I find that it slows down the autofocus capability too much.
Thanks for taking the time to share your experience, Jeff. Much appreciated.
Hello,
I’m a photography beginner on a limited budget and have purchased a Canon T1i with the Canon 18-55 and a Tamron 28-270. My question is will a teleconverter work with the Tamron 18-270 f3.5/6.3?? I’m shooting my daughters football games and surfing competitions. I don’t have the funds to drop on a really expensive lens. Your expertise is greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Paul
f/6.3 is way too dim to be effective with either a 1.4x or 2x TC. You really will be better off with a faster lens if you’re looking to extend its focal length.
Dear sir,
First thank you for doing this Q&A very helpful.
I just bought the Canon 70-200mm F4.0L usm to pair with my t2i body and would like to buy the kenko 1.4x TC pro dg? Is this a good combo? I know I will only gain 80mm more for having this combo but I ‘d like to be able to use Auto focus, is that the concern I have do you recommend the 2x instead?
I also have EF-S 18-200mm f3.5-5.6 and EF-s 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 are these going to work with kenko 1.4x? My camera is Canon t2i/550D.
I really really appreciate your help. Thank you very much I really wanted to get more reach.
More power to you sir.
Peter
1.4x TC with 70-200mm f/4 L on your 550D is okay.
1.4x TC with EF-S 18-200mm f3.5-5.6 or EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 might still give you passable AF performance. Forget about thinking of using 2x TC with any of these two lenses.
Great!!! I appreciate it.
Thank you very much. Now I will shop around for the kenko.
have a nice day.
Peter
sir,
Website store has two of the kenko 1.4x 1 is cheaper than the other
they are:
the first 1 kenko 1.4x teleplus 4 elements dgx auto focus for eos camera this is $135.00 and the other 1 is kenko 1.4x pro 300 teleconverter DGX for canon eos which of the two should I get.
in the first 1 ($135) in the picture it’s printed mc4.
Thanks a lot,
Peter
I don’t know which model is newer. You’ll have to check Kenko’s website: http://www.thkphoto.com/
Hi there, Thanks for the good work.
I have a Canon EOS 550D and EF-S55-250 mm and yes I know, non of the converters in the world will work…
What for options do I have to extend my reach besides buying a different lens? I like to make surf/windsurf photos
Thanks and regards from Down under..
Mick
With a 1.4x TC, you might get okay performance with that lens in daylight. But, in the long run, I think you should consider a good f/4 telephoto lens with the reach you want.
Hi, I have a canon 400d with 70-300mm f/4-5.6L. I was planning on purchasing a kenko pro 300 dgx 1.4 extender since canon are not compatible with this L series lens. I want to know if this combo of body+lens+extender is compatible & good.
Thanks!
The answer is in the previous comments.
Hello sir,
I have a canon 1000d camera and a EF75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM lens. Do you think if i get a canon 2x (or kenko 2x) converter it will work with my lens? I don’t want to spend money on converter if this body does not support it. i would rather upgrade for a better body and then later i would go for the lens upgrade. please suggest what should i do.
Thanks a lot,
Sada
You’re better off with a better body and lens.
I’m using a Canon 50D, I was wondering if the Kenko 1.4x or 2x extender will work on the EF 100mm f/2.8L macro and sigma 150-500mm telephoto lenses?
As far as stop loss is concerned, the 100mm f/2.8L should work fine. No experience with the Sigma 150-500mm.
Just tried the 2x teleconverter on the Sigma 150-500mm, it works well. Quite happy with some bird photography with it. Haven’t tried the tape trick yet…will share it once I try it.
Hi ,
I have Canon 500D n i’m using EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 lens. Which teleconverter would u suggest me…..
The answer is in one of the many replies of mine above.
Hi, I’m using a Canon 7D, and I have the Canon 70-300 f/4-5.6L.. if I use the Kenko 1.4TC, will I lose AF ability, or will it work properly with this setup?
It’ll likely not work too well.
Bummer. Thank you for your response
You’re welcome, Mark.
Hi Tetanus,
Thank you for sharing your knowledge on Teleconverter.
Kindly assist:
I am from Singapore.
I own 7D and 24-105mm f4L, and thinking of buying Teleconverter Teleplus Kenko Pro 300 2x DG C-AF. lensa Tele Canon.
Will this work well in autofocusing and quality? is it worth it?
I know you are recommending 1.4x instead but I noticed a good bargain in town and I can’t resist wanting to get it.
your advice is highly appreciated and I wont go to grab it untill I hear from you. :)
Cheers,
wem
Hi Wem,
I still won’t recommend using a 2x TC with a f/4 lens. This combination will work if you have a EOS-1 series camera; with your 7D, the stop loss is beyond what the camera requires for guaranteed AF performance.
Hi Tetanus,
Thank you for your kind advice. understood.
I’ll save for 75-300mm L instead :)
cheers…
what about Kenko 2x Teleplus Pro 300 Teleconverter for nikon F mount, is there any tape trick also?
No experience with Nikon. Sorry.
Thanks for writing this, I’ve been looking for something like this for so long !
Hi will this tape trick damage my camera
Does it allow me to use mode at all times
Is there a cheaper teleconverter with full af mode for canon 550d
No, the tape trick won’t hurt your camera in any way. As for cheap, these teleconverters are as cheap as they come.
I was told that only white Canon converters will work on white Canon lenses. Well I do have a Sigma 1.4x converter and it work just as well as the Canon converter. Then I actually use the tape method as described and guest what? Auto focus is active. Granted a bit slow, but it work. Now is my question is it a sales talk that only white converters will work on white lenses?
It’s not just sales talk. Canon teleconverters have a front element that is protruding, designed specially to extend into the recessed rear lens element found on certain Canon super telephoto lenses.
Hi there I just got a Sony slt a55vl and I got a tamron sp 70-300mm f/4-5.6 and I am looking for the best 2x for it what do you recommend for it and I also have a canon t1i what do you recommend for it thanks a lot
Sorry, I have no experience with Sony DSLRs.
I have a Canon 500D body and a EF 70-300mm f4-5.6L IS USM lense, from previous comments I assume I will be struggling to get AF at 300mm, when the lense is fully extended. Will the TCs work with manual focus in particular the Kenko 2x Teleplus Pro 300, or would you stick to the 1.4x TC
Yes, you’re right about your assumption; AF performance will be poor. For your lens, I wouldn’t recommend the 1.4x TC either, unless you don’t mind focusing manually which you certainly can even with a TC attached.
good day sir tetanus. these topic is so interesting and thanks for bringing out this trick. i have a sigma 50-500mm F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM, quite a slow lens especially on low light, and sigma 2s tele converter, mounted on canon eos 50D. AF is not working. do you think if i apply taping the tele converter, AF will be active on this lens even to its maximum range of 500mm?
more power to you sir…and enjoy shooting!
Yes, the tape trick is to trick the camera into engaging AF for what it otherwise sees as a lens that’s too slow.
But, even so, AF performance is likely to be very poor because the one-stop (for a 1.4x TC) or two-stop (for a 2x TC) loss is a physical problem which cannot be helped due to the extra glass in the TCs.